⚑ Bears on the p. 165 ⛔ NOT READ. The unread sub-lemma there was a compound in -ܡܳܐ cross-referred to a short target, and ܡܶܛܽܠ ܡܳܐ v. ܡܛܠ was the reading rejected on glyph count. This entry is where such a cross-reference would land. NOT enough to write the p. 165 record — the count still disagrees — but the next reader should test that pairing first.
| voc | gloss_en | gloss_de | raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ܡܶܛܽܠܗܳܢܳܐ | on that account, therefore | deswegen | ܡܶܛܽܠܗܳܢܳܐ deswegen | on that account, therefore |
| ܡܶܛܽܠ ܕ | because | weil | ܡܶܛܽܠ ܕ weil | because |