A Syriac Chrestomathy

sources for syriacists

R3 · nestle-1889-en/r3/c078-1

work peshitta:gen:4:18-26

work_note

Chrestomathia I, Caput IV, FINAL PAGE OF THE PIECE. Lines 36–51; marginal 40, 45, 50. Verse numerals 19–26. Ends at Gen 4:26, ܗܝܕܝܢ ܫܪܝ ܠܡܩܪܐ ܒܫܡܗ ܕܡܪܝܐ, which closes 'Quattuor prima capita Geneseos'; Chrestomathia II (Matthew 5) begins on p. 79.

⚑ One square-bracket supplement, [.] at 4:19 — a supplied PUNCTUATION point, not a word. It is the only bracket of that kind in the slice and it is worth noting that Nestle brackets even a point when his exemplar lacks it.

⚑ UNCERTAIN: the verb at 4:25, transcribed ܘܚܟܡ below. The plate token is four or five letters opening with ܘ; ܘܚܟܡ is what Nestle uses at 4:1 and 4:17 and is the Peshitta's word here, but the shape was read at strip resolution only. Flagged rather than silently normalised.

layer unvocalized Estrangela
layer_note Unvocalized Estrangela with seyame and diacritic points. Caput IV, from cod. Ambrosianus.

diff_target

Barnes, PENTATEUCHUS SYRIACE (post Samuelem Lee), BFBS London 1914 — archive.org ktavadeauritaauk00lees, title page verified at n6. PD. ⭐ PAGINATION CALIBRATED THIS PASS: printed page = leaf − 9 (n10 = p. 1, Gen 1:1–13, signature B; n11 = p. 2, running head ܣܦܪܐ ܕܒܪܝܬܐ + I. 14—28; agreement on two independent pages, per MAP.md's own method). Barnes prints unvocalized Estrangela with seyame and diacritic points, verse numbers in the outer margin against the line on which a verse opens, * as verse divider and at the close of a paragraph. See research/syriac-peshitta-editions.md

layer_source read from the plate
seyame yes
lines_per_page 16
page_number_form Syriac numeral letter, centred at head — no arabic number printed
line_numbers marginal, every 5, in the OUTER margin (right on rectos, left on versos); numbering RESTARTS at each Caput

transcription_method

Read from the plate, line by line, off 3.0–5.5x crops cut by horizontal projection (one strip per 2–4 printed lines); the 1.75x half-crops of tools/quarry_fetch.sh are NOT sufficient for pointed Serto and were used only for orientation. Consonantal skeleton, seyame, word division, punctuation, verse numerals, marginal line numerals and square-bracket supplements are read directly. ⚠ HONEST LIMIT, per the never-read-codepoints-by-eye rule: the West-Syriac vowel points are legible AS SHAPES at this resolution (zqofo prints as a small circle, ptoho as an open triangle, and so on — calibrated on ܐܰܠܳܗܳܐ, which recurs on every page), but the finest layer — rukkakha/qushshaya bars, the ܗ̇ point, linea occultans — is recorded where seen and is not warranted point-by-point. The vocalisation below is therefore a plate reading at the word level, not a certified diacritic-level edition; a blind control on a sample ([[reference_arabic-control-rule]]) is still owed before this text is shipped.

text_syr_voc

ܘܡܬܘܫܐܝܠ ܐܘܠܕ ܠܠܡܟ. ¹⁹ ܘܢܣܒ ܠܡܟ ܠܗ ܬܪ̈ܬܝܢ ܢܫܝ̈ܢ. ܫܡܗ ܕܚܕܐ ܥܕܐ. ܘܫܡܗ ܕܐܚܪܬܐ ܨܠܐ[.] ²⁰ ܘܝܠܕܬ ܥܕܐ ܠܝܘܒܠ. ܗܘ ܗܘܐ ܐܒܐ ܠܥܡܪ̈ܝ ܒܡܫܟܢܐ ܘܩܢܝܢ̈ܝ ܩܢܝܢܐ. ²¹ ܘܫܡܐ ܕܐܚܘܗܝ ܝܘܒܠ. ܗܘ ܗܘܐ ܐܒܐ ܠܟܠ ܕܐܚܝܕ ܟܢܪܐ ܘܩܝܬܪܐ. ²² ܘܨܠܐ ܐܦ ܗܝ ܝܠܕܬ ܠܬܘܒܠܩܝܢ. ܐܘܡܢ ܟܠ ܥܒܕ ܕܢܚܫܐ ܘܕܦܪܙܠܐ. ܘܚܬܗ ܕܬܘܒܠܩܝܢ ܢܥܡܐ. ²³ ܘܐܡܪ ܠܡܟ ܠܢܫܘ̈ܗܝ. ܥܕܐ ܘܨܠܐ ܫܡܥܝ̈ܢ ܩܠܝ. ܢܫܝ̈ ܕܠܡܟ ܨܘܬܝ̈ܢ ܠܡܐܡܪܝ.. ܡܛܠ ܕܓܒܪܐ ܩܛܠܬ ܒܦܘܪܥܢܝ. ܘܛܠܝܐ ܒܚܒܪ̈ܬܝ. ²⁴ ܡܛܠ ܕܚܕ ܒܫܒܥܐ ܢܬܦܪܥ ܩܐܝܢ. ܘܠܡܟ ܫܒܥܝܢ ܘܫܒܥܐ. ²⁵ ܘܚܟܡ ܐܕܡ ܬܘܒ ܠܚܘܐ ܐܢܬܬܗ. ܘܒܛܢܬ ܘܝܠܕܬ ܒܪܐ. ܘܩܪܬ ܫܡܗ ܫܝܬ. ܡܛܠ ܕܝܗܒ ܠܝ ܐܠܗܐ ܙܪܥܐ ܐܚܪܢܐ ܚܠܦ ܗܒܝܠ ܕܩܛܠܗ ܩܐܝܢ. ²⁶ ܘܠܫܝܬ ܐܦ ܠܗ. ܐܬܝܠܕ ܠܗ ܒܪܐ. ܘܩܪܐ ܫܡܗ ܐܢܘܫ. ܗܝܕܝܢ ܫܪܝ ܠܡܩܪܐ ܒܫܡܗ ܕܡܪܝܐ.

primer_notes Apparatus: the square-bracket supplement [.] at 4:19. No footnotes.

alignment

status keyed from Nestle; checked against Barnes 1914

diff

⭐ CHECKED against Barnes p. 7 (leaf n16).

AGREEMENT on the Lamech pericope, which is the densest name-cluster in the whole slice and therefore the best test of the extraction: ܠܡܟ · ܥܕܐ · ܨܠܐ · ܝܘܒܠ (twice, for two different sons) · ܬܘܒܠܩܝܢ · ܢܥܡܐ · ܫܝܬ · ܐܢܘܫ, all agreeing. Also ܟܢܪܐ ܘܩܝܬܪܐ · ܐܘܡܢ ܟܠ ܥܒܕ ܕܢܚܫܐ ܘܕܦܪܙܠܐ · ܩܛܠܬ ܒܦܘܪܥܢܝ ܘܛܠܝܐ ܒܚܒܪ̈ܬܝ · ܫܒܥܝܢ ܘܫܒܥܐ · ܗܝܕܝܢ ܫܪܝ ܠܡܩܪܐ ܒܫܡܗ ܕܡܪܝܐ.

The 4:25 verb (see work_note) reads ܘܚܟܡ in Barnes as well, which is why it is transcribed so here; but the Nestle plate is the weaker of the two readings and the flag stands rather than being quietly cashed in against the control — ⛔ agreeing with the control is not the same as having read the plate.

No other divergence found.

source

primer nestle-1889-en
page 78
leaf n167